Josep Maria Bartomeu makes Lionel Messi confession after resigning. The distress at Barcelona took a new turn when president Josep Maria Bartomeu surrendered recently.
Outgoing Barcelona president Josep Maria Bartomeu has asserted he remained on after their mortifying 8-2 annihilation to Bayern Munich since it was the best way to keep Lionel Messi.
In a dazzling new development on Tuesday night, Bartomeu reported he and the directorate had all ventured down.
Bartomeu was set to leave his part in March 2021 however a demonstration of general disapproval had quickened the cycle and he has picked to leave early.
The emergency at the Nou Camp comes as they keep on managing the aftermath from August’s thrashing to Bayern.
Club chief Lionel Messi delivered an exchange demand in any case stayed while Ronald Koeman supplanted Quique Setien as administrator.
Messi’s relationship with Bartomeu was at an all-time low but the Argentine decided to stay to reduce the chaos at Barcelona.
But in his exit statement, Bartomeu insisted the board needed to stay in place to steady the ship amid increasing financial strain and the battle to keep Messi.
“After being knocked out of the Champions League, the easiest thing was to leave,” he said. “The easiest thing was to resign.
“However the day after that excruciating annihilation we needed to take choices that we were unable to put off any more, key to ensuring the brandishing future and prompt maintainability of the Club.
“Moreover, we needed to do as such in the center of a worldwide emergency unprecedented. We were unable to leave the Club in the possession of an Interim Board with restricted forces.
“Who might have discovered the new mentor? Who might have dealt with moves? Who might have battled for Leo Messi to remain? Who might have completed the spending cuts? Who might have dealt with the compensation changes of the expert sportspeople at the Club?
“As a Board we got that, out of obligation, we need to take those choices. Most of which were awkward and disagreeable.
“The most evident sign that we were not clutching power is that we called decisions for the period of March. The most punctual date permitted by the Statutes.
“That was on the grounds that we accepted that this would assist with quieting things down, permit groups to work and permit an arranged progress to the recently chose Board of Directors.
“An early renunciation would have prompted the Club being tied up in a discretionary cycle, a force vacuum, under the administration of an Interim Board with restricted forces that inside half a month would need to take brandishing and financial choices with genuine outcomes that couldn’t be put off.”